This guest post is the fifth in a series by Kauffman Foundation grantees and other partners sharing insights on entrepreneurship diversity and inclusion. These timely topics will be discussed at this year’s Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship, Dec. 1-2, in St. Petersburg, Florida.
In 1928, Scottish biologist Sir Alexander Fleming was investigating the properties of the bacteria that create staph infections. Sir Alexander was a legendarily messy scientist, and one weekend, he left without thoroughly cleaning up all of his petri dishes. It was a musty, damp weekend, and in his lab, mildew began to creep into the dishes. When he returned, one of the dishes had a specific mold growing in it that had killed the bacteria. He had discovered penicillin—the most widely used drug in the world.
What I think about every time I hear that story: what happened if Sir Alexander had overlooked the dish? Similarly, what petri dish—or revolutionary advance—are we overlooking today?
In the United States, venture capital investors support startups with $50 billion a year. These investors provide not only needed capital, but also access to mentors, expertise and other guidance that help young firms grow. Yet, nearly 80 percent of that funding and support goes to entrepreneurs in just three U.S. states and less than 5 percent goes to women founders and less than 1 percent goes to people of color.
Alternative ways of investing, however, can lead to discoveries of talented entrepreneurs who live in “fly-over country” or who don’t look like other entrepreneurs.
Take, for example, Emily Morris, an engineer from Georgia Tech in Atlanta. Her company, Emrgy, is essentially a floating pontoon that can be placed in any moving body of water and generate hydroelectric power. Despite a contract with the City of Atlanta, more traction than most energy companies and a major U.S. Department of Energy pilot, Emily struggled to raise funding. A major local angel group expressed interest and spent months alternating between asking for significant amounts of information and returning with radio silence. Emily felt that she had to show up and be a mix of confident, deferential and patient, even though the angel investors were not taking the time to get to know her business.
At our firm, Village Capital, we have thought critically over the past seven years about new ways to identify, support and invest in entrepreneurs. Instead of investment professionals making investment decisions, we enable peer entrepreneurs to select which entrepreneurs are most likely to make a successful investment.
A growing body of research in forecasting, led by Stanford professor Justin Berg and others, suggests that the most able evaluators of an idea’s ability to succeed are not professionals higher-up in the hierarchy, but other innovators in the same sector who are also creating their own ideas. (Based on this research, Cirque du Soleil now selects which acts will go on stage not by manager’s decision, but by peer evaluation.)
In 2015, Village Capital ran a national program in Albuquerque, in partnership with the Kauffman Foundation and the City of Albuquerque, where Emily and other top innovators in water came from across the country to learn from each other and experts as they built their business. We pre-committed $100,000 in investment capital to two entrepreneurs who were selected by their peers—and when the evaluations were in, Emily earned the investment in a landslide.
Beyond the perks of investment, Emily said that the peer review was much more collaborative and productive, and ultimately gave her a much fairer shot than traditional investors. When pitching to venture capitalists, Emily felt pressure to promise the moon and hockey-stick growth. But with her peers, Emily felt that she could under-promise and over-deliver because they understood the same industry. She felt like, for once, she got a fairer shot.
Moreover, using this model, Village Capital has made 90 percent of our investments in states other than Massachusetts, California and New York. We’re also proud that 40 percent of our investments have been in women, and 20 percent have been in people of color.
Fleming famously told newspapers of the time: “One sometimes finds what one is not looking for. When I woke up just after dawn on September 28, 1928, I certainly didn’t plan to revolutionize all medicine by discovering the world’s first antibiotic, or bacteria killer. But I guess that was exactly what I did.”
Entrepreneurs who are under-valued by the market tend to over-perform in peer selection. The more cities seek to expand access to capital, talent and resources to founders who the market is under-valuing, the more potential they have to come up with redefining breakthroughs that revolutionize entrepreneurship. This, in turn, helps create the more prosperous and inclusive economy we are all striving toward.
Ross Baird developed the Village Capital concept in 2009 and, as CEO, has led the development of programs worldwide.
Want to be like Silicon Valley? Welcome Immigrant Entrepreneurs
The Connectivity of Hip-Hop’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Defining Entrepreneurship: From Dataset to Mindset
The 2016 Mayors Conference in 14 Tweets
2017 Kauffman Junior Faculty Fellowships: Top Scholars Wanted
Is Entrepreneurship the Most Productive Part of our Economy?
Highlights from the 2016 REER Conference