Entrepreneurship is the engine of economic growth and the primary source of net new job creation in the United States. New businesses offer those they employ opportunities for upward economic mobility. They challenge existing firms to innovate and improve. And they contribute to the economic dynamism that fuels a growing economy.
Entrepreneurship, however, is an inherently risky and uncertain proposition. Approximately half of all firms are no longer in business after five years. Added to the uncertainty of entrepreneurial success is the loss of benefits, like health insurance, that accompany stable employment.
Many proponents of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) seized on this point, claiming that changes to health insurance ushered in by the law would boost entrepreneurship by weakening the effects of "job lock".
The argument was if individuals value health insurance and can only afford insurance when provided by an employer, decoupling employment and health insurance will create new possibilities for these workers. In other words, when social benefits are available outside employment, people are more willing to take risks and become entrepreneurs.
But health coverage is only one form of insurance. Other policies offer protection against risk and economic hazards as well. Given declining rates of entrepreneurship, it is worth exploring whether policy can boost firm formation by mitigating the fundamental risks of entrepreneurship.
Health Insurance for Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking
A Lack of Health Insurance May Impede Entrepreneurship
Increased Access to Health Insurance Causes Different Affects to Different People
Social Insurance for Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking
In 2002, France passed a plan to stimulate new business creation called PARE (Plan d'Aide au Retour à l'Emploi). This program allowed individuals to retain access to their unemployment benefits for three years if they started a business. Previously, and as is in the United States, when the unemployed chose to start a business, they immediately lost their unemployment benefits and assumed the full burden of the risk of entrepreneurship.
After the introduction of the program, new business creation flourished in France. Monthly firm creation rates increased by 25 percent, as more unemployed potential entrepreneurs took this loosening of the benefit policy as an opportunity to start their own companies.
Interestingly, the program didn't attract less qualified or talented entrepreneurs. The researchers found that these firms were more likely to hire, were more productive and paid higher wages than their incumbent competitors.
The authors of the study argue that its results validate an "experimentation view" of entrepreneurship. When the risks to entrepreneurship are shared, they conclude, more individuals see entrepreneurship as a viable path.
Reduce the Opportunity Cost of Entrepreneurial Experimentation
Facilitate Asset Accumulation
Preserve Entrepreneurial Entry and Competition by Decreasing Incumbent Bias
Kauffman Compilation: Research on Gender and Entrepreneurship
A Fair Fight: Entrepreneurship and Competition Policy